Chris Broussard stepped into the middle of the Alex Pretti debate, and NBA Fans wasted no time turning his post into another all-out comment war.
The longtime analyst tweeted his own take on the situation, writing, “If u can’t clearly & boldly state the craziness of Democrats being unable to define what a woman is & saying men can get pregnant, AND the madness of Republicans defending the murder of Alex Pretti, then you’re following a political party/ideology & not The Lord Jesus Christ.”
If u can’t clearly & boldly state the craziness of Democrats being unable to define what a woman is & saying men can get pregnant, AND the madness of Republicans defending the murder of Alex Pretti, then you’re following a political party/ideology & not The Lord Jesus Christ.
— Chris Broussard (@Chris_Broussard) January 25, 2026
Within minutes, NBA Fans flooded the replies.
One of the most shared responses came from @rabbitpuncher, who dismissed Broussard’s stance entirely, saying, “If you were silent on the murder of Charlie Kirk, you have no business saying this.”
That line set off a wave of replies accusing Broussard of picking and choosing when to speak.
Another user, @louisfoster4321, took a different angle, writing, “One was murdered by crazy kid raised by Christian fascists and the other was murdered by our fascist government.”
Their comment pulled NBA Fans into a deeper fight over whether the situations Broussard mentioned could even be compared.
From there, the thread fractured.
Some NBA Fans backed Broussard, saying he was calling out blind loyalty on both sides. Others said he was forcing unrelated issues together in the middle of a moment about death and violence. Screenshots of old tweets, political clips, and past controversies started circulating as users tried to frame his motives.

What made the reaction even stronger was the timing. Many NBA Fans felt the post came too soon after Alex Pretti’s death and focused on the wrong things. Others argued that Broussard’s point was exactly about timing, about when people choose to speak and what they choose to highlight.
The replies quickly moved beyond Broussard himself. NBA Fans argued about faith, politics, and whether public figures should mix all three when real people have just died.
For many, the post wasn’t just another opinion. It became a trigger. And once it hit timelines, NBA Fans did what they always do in moments like this: picked sides, questioned motives, and turned one tweet into a much bigger fight.
NBA Fans Tear Into Chris Broussard Thread As Religion And Politics Collide
As Chris Broussard’s tweet spread, one reply chain took on a life of its own and showed just how deep the split had become.
User @jcblawfirm tried to slow things down, telling people, “I think people are missing Chris’s point. Which is that if you profess yourself as a Christian and you are blindly following any political party or ideology, then you need to ask yourself if you are truly following Jesus Christ.”

The post framed Broussard’s message as a religious question, not a political one.
NBA Fans did not agree on that reading.
@FreshCutJus13 pushed back hard, saying, “I think you’re missing the point…PPL ARE DYING AND HES WORRIED ABOUT TRANS PPL.” They added, “If he meant something else he would’ve said something else! Stop making excuses.”
That reply was shared widely by NBA Fans who felt Broussard had centered the wrong issue at the worst time.
Another response that gained traction came from @DKuzNY, who wrote, “Accepting trans people doesn’t mean you follow a political ideology or a party. It means you accept people as they are. Sort of like what Jesus taught.”
That comment shifted the argument again, pulling religion itself into the spotlight.
From there, the thread exploded.
NBA Fans argued over whether Broussard was making a fair comparison or a false one. Some said he was trying to “both sides” two things that did not belong in the same sentence. Others said people were purposely ignoring the faith-based point he was making.
The replies turned personal fast. Users accused each other of hiding behind religion, abusing it, or attacking it. Some said the whole post showed why faith and politics should never be mixed. Others said separating them was impossible.

By the end of the thread, the talk had drifted far from Alex Pretti himself. NBA Fans were now debating Christianity, trans issues, government violence, and whether any of it should have been tied together in the first place.
The exchange showed how quickly one tweet can become a battleground. And for NBA Fans watching it unfold, Broussard’s comment didn’t bring clarity. It opened another door to an argument that kept growing instead of closing.