@YahooSports reported that “Elle Duncan is slated to lead USA Network’s WNBA studio coverage next season,” adding that “USA is set to broadcast at least 50 games in 2026.”
On paper, it was a simple media move. Online, it turned into another loud night for WNBA fans.
Within minutes, reactions split hard. Some congratulated Duncan. Most of the replies, though, were flooded by arguments over politics, bias, and whether she should even be on the desk.
@FLotGSports fired one of the earliest shots, posting, “Perfect job for a Far Left activist.” Not long after, @cdssportspod piled on with, “No one wants this.”
No one wants this.
— CDS Uncensored (@cdssportspod) January 22, 2026
Those two lines alone were enough to steer the tone. From there, WNBA fans filled the replies with doubts, jokes, and long threads about what they think Duncan represents.
A big part of the pushback came from WNBA fans who believe coverage is already slanted. Several Caitlin Clark supporters said they expect unfair treatment of their favorite. Others weren’t focused on politics at all and instead questioned Duncan’s skill set, saying the role should go to someone else. The few “congrats” and “you can do it” posts were there, but they were buried fast.

For WNBA fans, this announcement isn’t just about a studio host. It taps into a larger fear that the league’s media voice will reflect personal views instead of staying neutral. That belief, whether fair or not, keeps showing up whenever a new face gets a big role.
What makes this moment stand out is how quickly the reaction jumped past the job itself. Instead of talking about the broadcast schedule or what 50 games on USA Network means, WNBA fans turned it into a debate about trust, favoritism, and who should be shaping the league’s image.
None of that came from the report. @YahooSports simply shared the news. The rest was built in the replies. That’s the current space WNBA fans operate in. Even a basic hire becomes a culture fight, with every new move seen as proof of something bigger.
Whether Duncan’s coverage ends up loved or criticized, one thing is already clear. WNBA fans aren’t waiting to see how it goes. They’ve already decided what this means, long before the first show even airs.
WNBA fans shift tone as USA Network reveals full WNBA broadcast team
A different mood showed up when @USANetwork officially introduced its full broadcast group, posting, “Some amazing names are joining @USANetwork’s coverage of the @WNBA.”
The list included Elle Duncan as Studio Host, Renee Montgomery as Studio Analyst, Kate Scott and Meghan McPeak on play-by-play, Sarah Kustok as Game Analyst, and Paris Lawson and Edona Thaqi in reporting roles.

This time, WNBA fans didn’t rush in angry. The replies leaned far more upbeat.
Elle Duncan herself kicked things off in the comments with, “Legggoooo ladies!!” Renee Montgomery followed right behind her, adding, “A time will be had!” Those two posts were quickly surrounded by heart emojis turned into [heart emoji], fire reactions turned into [fire emoji], and messages from WNBA fans excited to see a mostly women-led team across the coverage.
Many WNBA fans said they were happy to see familiar faces and a lineup they already associate with women’s sports. Some pointed to Montgomery’s experience, others to Kustok’s long run in broadcasting, and a lot simply welcomed the idea of a group that already knows the space they’re stepping into.
There were still a few skeptical replies. A handful of WNBA fans repeated worries about bias or favoritism. But compared to the reaction under the earlier Yahoo Sports post, the tone here was noticeably lighter. The full list seemed to reassure people who were unsure about a single name leading the show.

It also reframed the conversation. Instead of one hire, WNBA fans were now looking at a whole crew. That shift mattered. The comments focused more on chemistry, energy, and whether the team would be fun to watch, rather than on personal views.
For WNBA fans, this second wave showed how context changes everything. One headline sparked backlash. A full roster brought excitement. The same move, two different reactions, depending on how the story was told and who was standing next to whom.
